Beiträge von dartos

    TELEVISION EVENTS

    Currently just two events are televised, the Winmau World Masters and
    the Lakeside World Professional Championship. Prior to that Setanta
    Sports had televised four other events, however this only lasted one
    year. Previously there had been no British televised events, outside of
    the two majors, for several years. With the advent of many sports
    channels, together with the likes of ITV4 showing major sporting events
    it is an area which has significant potential. The introduction of ESPN
    into the game of darts and specifically the BDO can only be a major
    positive injection; however their introduction comes at a cost which is
    the loss of the BBC to the World Masters. The overall cost will only be
    identified in real terms once the event has taken place. However the
    fact that the event is televised at all gives the BDO hope for the
    future. The World Masters however is another competition which is in
    danger of losing its identity, over the past 12 months a new points
    table was introduced so it was easier for all to track the World
    Masters rankings, with a now regular switch from the latter end of the
    year to September and back again means the competition has once again
    thrown up players being able to get two sets of points for one
    tournament or none at all depending on the date. It is essential the
    competition finds a stable date in the calendar.

    The World Professional Championships is a week long event in which the
    BBC has several programmes and several hours which are needed to be
    filled. If this is continued with its afternoon programme then the BDO
    must take the opportunity to establish a five minute spot each day to
    promote the Organisation and its benefits.

    TOURNAMENT STRUCTURE

    The words structure and tournament have not been put together before
    within BDO tournaments. The attitude previously has been to put a
    tournament together and then decide what the format is going to be.
    Several issues need to be determined before any formal planning on this
    subject can be implemented; however a simple proforma would be to
    increase the length of matches at certain points within tournaments.
    The higher the category of the tournament the longer the latter stages
    should be. As such it might be that the final of a category ‘A’
    tournament would be a minimum of the best of five sets five legs to a
    set, however a category ‘C’ tournament might just be the minimum of the
    best of nine legs. Furthermore the categorisation in respect of the
    numbers entering a competition should be based on the previous year’s
    numbers not the current years.

    PRIZE MONEY

    Several years ago it was introduced that the category of a tournament
    had to have a minimum first prize. This was supported by the number of
    entries into that competition. The current categorisation is dependant
    on the prize fund rather than the first prize; however there is no
    determination as to how the prize fund is distributed. We believe that
    each category should be dependant on both the first prize and also how
    the fund is distributed.

    BICC

    The BICC has since its inception been the flagship of the BDO. The
    function that on any one weekend in the region of 2300 dart players can
    represent their County and travel all over England, Scotland and Wales
    gives this competition huge potential for sponsorship and support.
    However the lack of any innovative ideas from the current board
    together with a consistent lack of sponsorship has degraded this
    competition enormously. The ability for counties to continue to produce
    teams and sufficient finance for those teams to continue within the
    BICC is rapidly diminishing. The current climate means that sponsors
    are no longer willing to part with their money as readily as in
    previous years. Therefore it is the onus of the board of the BDO to
    provide as much assistance as possible. In 2008 it was agreed to
    increase the money which counties put into the BICC in order to fund
    the points for the ‘B’ teams. Whilst we believe that the current
    funding going into the BICC from the Counties is sufficient, the amount
    returned to the counties in the way of prize money is not. The BDO has
    cut its costs for the BICC year on year because of the introduction and
    implementation of the email system and then with the utilisation of
    DFW. However none of these savings have been passed onto the Counties.

    The current income for the BICC from counties is approximately £41,000
    and if the Superleague levy is included this takes it well over
    £50,000. With the outgoings in prize monies approximately £35,000 this
    leaves a minimum of a £15,000 shortfall. Whilst it is acknowledged that
    there is a significant amount of time and work put into the BICC we
    find it somewhat difficult to believe the cost of running the BICC
    comes close to £15,000.
    Therefore we believe two things can happen almost immediately, the
    first is to reassess the financial structure of the BICC and the second
    is to restructure the prize monies given to the counties. Furthermore
    there has been a long overdue need for the BICC to be given a facelift.
    Many competitions, outside of darts, over the past two decades have
    been revamped in order to provide long term sustainability. In order
    for the BICC to move forward a major review on the competition is
    essential. A working party made up of the current BICC Directors
    together with nominated representatives from each division, including
    Scotland will be given the opportunity to sit down and recommend a
    pathway forward for the BICC.
    SPONSORSHIP

    For several years now, sponsorship for the BDO has been limited to just
    a few companies. With Lakeside and Winmau the two main sponsors a few
    other companies such as East Yorkshire Events, John Smiths, Jackpot Joy
    and Pontins have made up the remaining sponsors. The recent
    introduction of Rileys was according to the board going to bring
    significant new income to the counties. Unfortunately this has not been
    forthcoming, and where Counties have received income it is not a
    sustainable long term answer. Therefore it is essential that the BDO in
    its movement forward identifies new areas for sponsorship as well as
    enhancing relationships with the current loyal group. It will be the
    responsibility of one individual to undertake the role of maintaining
    the current relationships and also developing new clients. The current
    board have also failed in any bid they may have undertaken to identify
    minor sponsors. These are the type of companies such as water
    manufacturers to sponsor the water placed on the stage. Another area
    maybe to sponsor individual boards at tournaments, if 32 boards were
    sponsored at £100 per board this money for instance would go a long way
    to paying for the accommodation for officials. The person who
    undertakes the role of obtaining sponsorship will be given the
    opportunity to develop a new strategy in obtaining and maintaining
    clients.

    Subject: Board of Directors

    Dear County Official

    For some time now the Board of the BDO have in our opinion failed in many areas. It is our belief that significant change is needed to the direction of the BDO; subsequently we have offered our nominations to be elected as board members at the forthcoming BDO AGM.

    We have structured a proposed document which outlines our belief in how the organisation should proceed in the future, a copy of which I have attached.

    If anyone has any questions which they wish to ask any prospective member then please feel free to contact us.

    Yours in the Sport of Darts


    BASE OUTLINE ON THE FUTURE OF THE

    BRITISH DARTS ORGANISATION


    This document will provide the basis for the direction of the British
    Darts Organisation (BDO) for the foreseeable future. The outline will
    be categorised and in some part detailed, however this is only intended
    as a framework and as such not a definitive document.

    The categories listed below are in no particular order, nor does its
    listing provide a specific prioritisation. Similarly until all funds
    are made apparent the speed in which this framework could be
    implemented is under question.

    The categories under review are not limited to those below however we
    believe these categories will provide the main structure for any
    evolvement within the organisation.

    British Counties and Countries
    Youth
    Ladies
    Tournaments
    BICC
    Sponsorship
    World Rankings
    Venues
    Media
    Equipment
    Marketing
    Officials
    Website
    WDF
    Professional Players
    IDPA
    PDC


    BRITISH COUNTIES AND COUNTRIES

    There has to be a closer bond between the Counties, Countries and the
    Board of the BDO. The counties we believe need to feel that the Board
    of Directors are working for them, that the system works for them and
    that they are an integral part of the system. To that end there is a
    need for the system to be looked at and improved. Whether it be the way
    paperwork is distributed and handled, to the way meetings are conducted
    a complete inspection of the system is needed.
    Furthermore the way in which the BDO deal with the Countries is another
    aspect which also requires looking at. The communication between the
    BDO, England, Scotland and Wales is something which needs urgently
    looking at. Each Country has its own agenda and pace which at times
    neither fits neatly into the BDO nor the way it works. To this end the
    BDO needs to understand each countries requirements and with that will
    come a united approach. To that extent the Board needs to sit down with
    the various Countries and include them in the framework for the future.


    YOUTH

    This is an area which has been long in need of a defined structure. The
    current regime has continually neglected this area, throwing together a
    few competitions and claiming it is looking after the future of
    tomorrow.

    The system in place at the moment is fundamentally driven by individual
    counties under the auspice of the Northern and Southern Inter County
    Youth Leagues. Few individual counties have specific structures, such
    as a Youth Superleague or an Academy.

    Where academies have been set up by individuals, or groups of
    individuals, rather than as a County system, they have in the main been
    either sponsored or part sponsored by Unicorn the main board
    manufacturer of the PDC. Subsequently the PDC have now claimed these
    Academies are their own.

    The introduction of the PDC World Youth Championship in 2010 was quite
    rightly hailed as a success. Following this tournament the PDC has now
    introduced a Youth Circuit which is going to produce a new breed of
    young player no longer in need of the BDO system.

    Therefore it is essential a structure is placed into the BDO system for
    the youth. The structure must be inclusive of all, and not as is
    currently within the PDC focused on the elite players. However the
    elite youth players must be recognised and nurtured ensuring they have
    both short and long term goals which should help them stay within the
    BDO system.

    To provide this system the BDO must have a Director who is both
    experienced within the setting up of youth systems (Academies), and has
    the drive and passion to develop not only a system, but also a network
    of regional and area centres and representatives which will develop the
    player, referee and official of tomorrow.

    It will be down to this Director to initially establish a system and
    framework which will benefit the BDO and the youth. This framework must
    include development of the current Child Protection System which at the
    moment has little leadership nor direction. It is also essential that
    individual counties take a greater responsibility for their Youth
    system. Currently there are several counties who have youth teams but
    do not interact with either their youth committee or indeed the players
    who represent their county.

    Ultimately the new system will incorporate the huge potential darts can
    play within the education process, a source currently untapped within
    the BDO system. In conjunction with this the top players within the BDO
    system should be encouraged to attend and heighten their profiles
    within these academies.

    LADIES

    The Ladies game has been the most disappointing aspect within the
    system. To restore the game to where it was five years ago in the terms
    of Ladies participating at tournaments will take several years. The
    number of Ladies participating within the BICC does not appear to have
    diminished, so the answer must lay elsewhere.

    The general standard of the game appears, with the exception of the top
    five or six Ladies, to have slipped. The averages within the BICC five
    years ago would have seen most teams in the top division averaging over
    20, now however the norm is around 19. Whilst this only equates to
    around a point per match it is normally being held up by individual
    players having 23+ averages, thus the general standard of play within
    the team has diminished.

    I believe that in the long term the youth project will restore the
    numbers back into the sport; however this is obviously not a short term
    and maybe not even a mid term fix. I believe to find the solution will
    take several influential figures within the sport to debate within the
    system as to the reasons why numbers have reduced.

    If you ask the top players you will not find the answer because they
    still attend tournaments all over Europe on a weekly basis. It is the
    average Lady playing within the BICC where the questions must be asked.
    To do this a set of questions need to be set down whereby at the end of
    the assessment there is not only a general idea of why the numbers have
    diminished, but also some thoughts and ideas as to how the Ladies game
    can be resurrected.

    TOURNAMENTS

    We believe this subject needs to be split up into several mini headings
    although some topics will overlap from one heading to another. The
    headings being, Opens, Members Only, Television Events, Tournament
    Structure and Prize Money.

    OPENS

    BDO organised Open events tend to be well supported; although the
    argument would be; do the events support the need of the member? At
    present there are just three open tournaments catered for in this
    country, together with the Torremolinos Open in Spain.


    The three events in this Country are the British Open, International
    Open and British Classic. I have not included the Camber Sands Festival
    as this is at present both an unknown quantity and also must have a
    doubt as to whether it will in fact get off the ground in 2012.

    The British Open five years ago was a flourishing competition. The
    introduction of Setanta Sports to televise the latter stages had
    several effects. The first was that the singles event was moved from
    the Sunday to the Saturday; this ensured higher viewing figures for the
    TV and also, because of the TV coverage, raised the numbers entering
    the singles. However it lowered the numbers entering the Pairs, as many
    players took the opportunity to make their return journey during the
    day on the Sunday. Since Setanta folded the decision was taken to leave
    the Singles on the Saturday. Over the past couple of years numbers have
    dwindled in both the Mens and the Ladies. We believe this is partly
    because the event is on the Saturday; Bridlington the venue for the
    Open, being on the North East Coastline makes it difficult to get to
    and from. Therefore some people do not want to travel in the rush hour
    on a Friday evening and feel that just to enter the singles is a waste
    of their time and money.

    If the pairs was reintroduced to the Saturday and the singles Sunday
    this we believe would have an immediate uplift in numbers. A further
    reason why the numbers have dropped in the pairs is that the monies are
    not taken until the Sunday morning, thus no pre entries. This has the
    effect that if a player cant be bothered on a Sunday morning then they
    just won’t enter and it hasn’t cost them anything. Furthermore the
    Friday money in money out competition, if it is to be continued, has to
    reorganise itself so that it costs less to enter the building that
    enter the competition.

    The International Open is the type of event which typifies the BDO and
    its ability to cater for all standards of player, both on the playing
    front, and also on the atmosphere and friendly environment front which
    is created during this weekend. The weekend gives an opportunity for
    the local pub player and his family to have a weekend of darts whilst
    at the same time as mixing with the stars. Given the current
    uncertainty with Pontins and the direction its buyers are going, if the
    facility at Brean Sands was to disappear then we believe it is
    essential that a similar facility be found to cater for this weekend.

    The British Classic has for many years failed to find an identity
    within the calendar. Its placement within the calendar together with
    the fact it only has a singles competition makes it difficult to gather
    the amount of playing competitors usually associated with BDO
    competitions. The change in venue from Kettering to Braintree had two
    effects. The first was it was noticeable in that the entries declined.
    This would mainly be due to two things, one a move away from the centre
    of the country, the second was that it was a new venue and this always
    has an effect. If you throw in the fact it was and still remains on a
    Saturday the entry numbers will deteriorate as individuals will not
    take the day off work just for one day of darts. The return to
    Kettering is a massive backward step in regard of the venue. The venue
    at Braintree had the ability to cope with any size of tournament, from
    the 300-400 players through to over a 1000 players with a stage and
    venue which had the ability to cater for an audience and unlimited TV
    resources.
    Kettering in the meantime has proven to be unsatisfactory for both
    large numbers of competitors and also TV. This tournament has to be
    looked at with regards to its identity and viability on the current
    calendar date.


    The Torremolinos Open has been on a fast track decline for the past
    three or four years. This tournament had for many years, been an ideal
    opportunity for darts in the Sun as the BDO advertised it. During the
    80’s, 90’s and the early part of the 21st Century this tournament was
    unique in that the family could go on holiday to Southern Spain and
    incorporate a week of darts. Several issues have materialised over the
    past decade, none of which have been addressed by the current
    administration. The issues which include the change in climate, the
    introduction of the Euro as the local currency, together with the poor
    playing venue, an increase in the cost of the holiday and the fact the
    same prize money is on offer now as was on offer 20 years ago. With all
    of these factors coming into account, this is a tournament which needs
    serious consideration on either its viability or structure.

    MEMBERS ONLY

    Currently there are definitively just two member’s only competitions
    the Gold Cup and the British Masters. The Gold Cup as with the British
    Masters provides a small window of opportunity for the local
    Superleague player to fast track themselves into the spotlight.

    Both competitions, especially the British Masters require a rethink
    into how they are organised both initially and at the finals stage.

    Und BBC Red Button bzw. Internet auch nicht?

    ?? Eher nicht. Vielleicht bietet ja ESPN ein "Streaming" an.

    Schon brutal dass die BDO null Leverage bei den TV-Rechten hat. Wenn der jetzige Vertrag mit der BBC endet sieht es sehr mau aus. Schade!

    Phil Taylor has revealed he may have to take a break from the PDC circuit to have surgery on his left shoulder.
    Taylor made the admission in the wake of his win in the World Matchplay in Blackpool on Sunday, admitting the time had come to get himself 100% physically in time for the World Championship.
    "I'll maybe have to go and have an operation on my left shoulder; I injured it a couple of years ago so I need a little bit of time out really to get myself physically right," Taylor said.
    "The main one is the World Championship - I've got to get myself right for that.
    "You can be your own worst critic so you have just got to enjoy what you do and just take your time and plod on.
    "I'm 51 next month so I can't keep going. I've got to eventually just sit back and relax, and enjoy my career."
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Taylor wird vielleicht ne Pause einlegen um sich seine linke Schulter operieren zu lassen.

    Ach ja stimmt ja, okay dann scheint die CLD nicht zu zählen.
    Dazu habe ich eh noch fragen. Weiß jemand das genaue System der CLD? Habe dieses Turnier noch nie verfolgt, weil es irgendwie an mir vorbei ging. Aber ich hab mir das ganze mal auf Wikipedia angeschaut und blicke nicht wirklich durch. Einige Spieler sind mehrfach in den Gruppen manche nur einmal usw..kann mir das jemand erklären?

    Das habe ich nicht gesagt. Und eigentlich sollte ja auch nicht ein TV-Sender bestimmen welches Turnier als Major zählt. Die PDC schrieb beim 2ten UK Open Sieg von Wade - sein 7ter major title...
    Aber so genau definiert die PDC die Kategorien nicht. Und nun die Erbsen - ist ein major title = Major oder doch "nur" ein Premier Event?



    Zu den Major-Turnieren: Es müssten mehr als 4 sein. Ich glaube Grand-Slam, Champions League und EM zählen auch noch. Als Wade die UK-Open gewann sagten sie was von 6 Mjor-Titeln.

    2X UK-Open, World Matchplay, World Grand Prix, Premier League Darts, Champions League sind seine Erfolge, also sollten da mehr Major sein. Ist ein Major nicht jedes Turnier,welches im TV übertragen wird?

    Den Grand Prix hat er auch 2x gewonnen. Wade sagt er hat 7 gewonnen - Sky spricht von 6 weil sie die CLD nicht zählen.
    Die klassischen sind: UK Open, Matchplay, Grand Prix + (Vegas)
    WM ist ja eigentlich eine eigen Kategorie, wird aber mitgezählt!

    PL (wird meistens als Major mitgezählt), CLD, Euros, Players Championship Finals, GSODs (wird meistens als Major mitgezählt), RTL7 - ????

    OOM 25.07.2011

    1 Phil Taylor £874,200
    2 Adrian Lewis £398,000
    3 James Wade £337,742 (4)
    4 Gary Anderson £299,300 (3)
    5 Simon Whitlock £259,750
    6 Raymond van Barneveld £219,100
    7 Wes Newton £213,239
    8 Mark Webster £189,942

    9 Terry Jenkins £170,970
    10 Paul Nicholson £167,921
    11 Andy Hamilton £157,236 (15)
    12 Mervyn King £150,600 (11)
    13 Mark Walsh £150,142 (12)
    14 Colin Lloyd £147,285 (13)
    15 Wayne Jones £146,000 (14)
    16 Vincent van der Voort £136,500 (17)

    17 Ronnie Baxter £134,442 (16)
    18 Jamie Caven £125,885
    19 Colin Osborne £122,642
    20 Andy Smith £117,800
    21 Steve Beaton £114,585 (22)
    22 Kevin Painter £113,242 (21)
    23 Denis Ovens £111,385
    24 Alan Tabern £97,239
    25 Co Stompe £93,521
    26 Robert Thornton £92,170
    27 Dennis Priestley £87,722
    28 Mark Dudbridge £80,800
    29 Jelle Klaasen £77,742
    30 Steve Brown £75,100
    31 John Part £71,142
    32 Barrie Bates £65,642

    33 Peter Wright £61,221
    34 Michael van Gerwen £60,700
    35 Brendan Dolan Northern £56,800
    36 Tony Eccles £48,842
    37 Kevin McDine £45,842
    38 Justin Pipe £45,200 (40)
    39 Mark Hylton £43,800 (38)
    40 Steve Farmer £43,100 (39)
    41 Kirk Shepherd £38,370
    42 Steve Hine £36,642
    43 Richie Burnett £34,200
    44 Roland Scholten £33,692
    45 Mensur Suljovic £32,200
    46 Steve Maish £30,935
    47 Dennis Smith £29,185
    48 Nigel Heydon £27,800
    49 Dave Chisnall £25,000
    50 Alex Roy £24,900

    51 Peter Manley £23,070
    52 Joe Cullen £22,400
    53 Chris Thompson £21,600
    54 Andy Jenkins £21,185
    55 Jyhan Artut £20,800
    56 Andree Welge £20,600
    57 Matt Clark £20,142
    58 Steve Evans £20,000
    59 Darin Young £19,771
    60 Wayne Mardle £19,442
    61 Tony Ayres £19,200
    62 Scott Rand £18,600
    63 Antonio Alcinas £18,300
    64 Colin Monk £17,685
    65 John Henderson £17,300 (69)
    66 Michael Smith £16,200 (65)
    67 Willie O Connor £15,700 (66)
    68 Darren Johnson £15,400 (67)
    69 John Magowan £15,200 (68)
    70 Bernd Roith £14,600
    71 Carlos Rodriguez £14,100
    72 Ian White £12,700
    73 Mark Frost £12,600
    74 Mick McGowan £12,500
    75 Nick Fulwell £11,700
    76 Gary Mawson £11,621
    77 Dylan Duo £10,900
    78 Aodhagen O Neill £10,400
    79 Wayne Atwood £9,800
    80 Ken MacNeil £9,521
    81 Michael Barnard £9,400
    82 Aaron Monk £9,300
    83 Adrian Gray £8,800
    84 Matt Padgett £8,500
    85 Martyn Turner £7,700
    86 Tomas Seyler £7,500
    87 Jarkko Komula £6,800
    88 Louis Blundell £6,800
    89 Magnus Caris £6,400
    90 Gary Welding £6,200
    91 Mark Lawrence £5,600
    92 Steve Grubb £5,600
    93 Steve Hardy £5,200
    94 Dave Smith £5,100
    95 Dave Ladley £5,100
    96 Pete Hudson £4,600
    97 Michael Mansell £4,200
    98 Shaun Griffiths £4,000
    99 Matt Edgar £3,600
    100 Shane O Connor £3,400

    Michael Rosenauer £3,400

    Doubles
    1 55.2% (74/134) Phil Taylor
    2 50.0% (8/16) Mark Hylton
    2 50.0% (6/12) Mervyn King
    4 48.8% (21/43) Mark Walsh
    5 47.7% (21/44) Paul Nicholson
    6 44.8% (64/143) James Wade
    7 43.8% (28/64) Wes Newton
    8 42.1% (8/19) Ronnie Baxter
    9 41.9% (49/117) Andy Hamilton
    10 41.0% (34/83) Raymond van Barneveld
    11 40.8% (53/130) Adrian Lewis
    12 40.5% (17/42) Wayne Jones
    13 39.2% (38/97) Simon Whitlock
    14 39.1% (18/46) Justin Pipe
    15 37.8% (17/45) Steve Beaton
    16 36.8% (21/57) John Henderson
    16 36.8% (7/19) Peter Wright
    18 35.3% (12/34) Kevin Painter
    19 34.5% (10/29) Colin Osborne
    20 34.0% (35/103) Mark Webster
    21 31.9% (15/47) Vincent van der Voort
    22 30.0% (3/10) Steve Brown
    23 28.6% (6/21) Gary Anderson
    24 27.3% (3/11) Terry Jenkins
    25 26.9% (7/26) Colin Lloyd
    26 26.1% (6/23) Scott Rand
    27 25.0% (11/44) Denis Ovens
    28 23.5% (8/34) John Part
    29 22.6% (7/31) Alan Tabern
    30 20.0% (2/10) Andy Smith
    31 16.7% (3/18) Dave Chisnall
    32 0.0% (0/12) Jamie Caven

    Turnier: 39.1% (612/1564)

    Last 32: 35.8%
    Achtelfinale: 41.2%
    Viertelfinale: 42.4%
    Halbfinale: 43.1%
    Finale: 44.1%

    Turnier-Average

    1 105.49 Phil Taylor

    2 99.56 Mark Hylton
    3 98.04 Gary Anderson
    4 96.05 Wes Newton
    5 95.86 Colin Osborne
    6 95.73 Adrian Lewis
    7 95.71 Simon Whitlock
    8 95.61 James Wade
    9 95.43 Raymond van Barneveld
    10 95.05 Mark Walsh

    11 94.98 Justin Pipe
    12 94.81 Andy Hamilton
    13 94.49 Steve Beaton
    14 94.49 Wayne Jones
    15 94.11 Paul Nicholson
    16 93.73 Dave Chisnall
    17 92.91 Kevin Painter
    18 92.28 Peter Wright
    19 91.69 Mark Webster
    20 91.02 Steve Brown
    21 90.75 John Part

    22 89.58 Vincent van der Voort
    23 88.99 Scott Rand
    24 88.18 John Henderson
    25 87.78 Denis Ovens
    26 87.38 Alan Tabern
    27 86.10 Terry Jenkins

    28 84.92 Colin Lloyd
    29 84.88 Ronnie Baxter
    30 84.22 Mervyn King
    31 84.13 Andy Smith
    32 82.00 Jamie Caven

    Turnier: 94.15 (2010: 92.88)

    Last 32: 91.70 (2010: 90.56)
    Achtelfinale: 94.68 (2010: 92.29)
    Viertelfinale: 96.24 (2010: 95.32)
    Halbfinale: 97.72 (2010: 98.35)
    Finale: 101.36 (2010: 102.66)

    Viertelfinale
    Deta Hedman 3-0 Tracey Johnson
    Trina Gulliver 3-1 Anastasia Dobromyslova

    Lorraine Farlam 3-0 Dee Bateman
    Julie Gore 3-1 Sarah Cope

    Halbfinale
    Trina Gulliver 3-1 Deta Hedman
    Lorraine Farlam 3-1 Julie Gore

    Finale
    Trina Gulliver 3-1 Lorraine Farlam
    74.07 vs 73.41


    Winner £500
    Final £200
    Semi final £80
    quater final £40
    Last 16 £20

    Achtelfinale
    Peter Boughey 3-0 Liam Morris
    Paul Carter 3-0 Sid Bell
    Gary Robson 3-1 James Wilson
    Garry Thompson 3-0 Wesley Harms

    Jan Dekker 3-0 Andy Cornwall
    Dean Winstanley 3-1 Gary Butcher
    Joe Murnan 3-0 Martin Adams
    Dave Prins 3-0 Darryl Fitton

    Viertelfinale
    Peter Boughey 3-1 Paul Carter
    Garry Thompson 3-1 Gary Robson

    Dean Winstanley 3-0 Jan Dekker
    Dave Prins 3-0 Joe Murnan

    Halbfinale
    Garry Thompson 2-1 Peter Boughey
    Dean Winstanley 2-1 Dave Prins

    Finale
    Dean Winstanley 2-0 Garry Thompson
    82.20 vs 84.03


    Winner £3,000
    Final £1000
    Semi Final £300
    Quarter Final £100
    Last 16 £40

    Thursday July 28
    20:05: King v Stompe
    20:35: Tabern v Lloyd
    21:05: Part v Wright
    21:35: Pipe v Nicholson
    22:05: Whitlock v Suljovic
    22:35: Taylor v Michael
    23:05: Webster v Jenkins
    23:35: Anderson v Caven

    Friday July 29
    20:05: Jones v Walsh
    20:35: Klaasen v Chisnall
    21:05: Baxter v van Gerwen
    21:35: Huybrechts v Alcinas
    22:05: Wade v Caris
    22:35: Lewis v van der Voort
    23:05: Newton v Smith
    23:35: van Barneveld v Hamilton

    Phil Taylor (1, ENG) v John Michael (GRE)
    Mervyn King (ENG) v Co Stompe (NED)
    Mark Webster (8, WAL) v Terry Jenkins (ENG)
    Justin Pipe (ENG) v Paul Nicholson (AUS)
    Simon Whitlock (5, AUS) v Mensur Suljovic (AUT)
    Alan Tabern (ENG) v Colin Lloyd (ENG)
    Gary Anderson (4, SCO) v Jamie Caven (ENG)
    John Part (CAN) v Peter Wright (ENG)

    Adrian Lewis (2, ENG) v Vincent van der Voort (NED)
    Jelle Klaasen (NED) v Dave Chisnall (ENG)
    Wes Newton (7, ENG) v Andy Smith (ENG)
    Kim Huybrechts (BEL) v Antonio Alcinas (ESP)
    Raymond van Barneveld (6, NED) v Andy Hamilton (ENG)
    Wayne Jones (ENG) v Mark Walsh (ENG)
    James Wade (3, ENG) v Magnus Caris (SWE)
    Ronnie Baxter (ENG) v Michael van Gerwen (NED)

    Last 32: Best of 11 legs
    Achtelfinale: Best of 19 legs
    Viertelfinale: Best of 19 legs
    Halbfinale: Best of 21 legs
    Finale: Best of 21 legs

    Sieger: GBP 50.000
    Finalist: GBP 25.000
    Halbfianle: GBP 10.000
    Viertelfinale: GBP 7.500
    Achtelfinale: GBP 5.000
    Last 32: GBP 2.500

    Doubles

    1 57.1% (56/98) Phil Taylor
    2 50.0% (8/16) Mark Hylton
    2 50.0% (6/12) Mervyn King
    4 48.8% (21/43) Mark Walsh
    5 47.7% (21/44) Paul Nicholson
    6 46.7% (56/120) James Wade
    7 43.8% (28/64) Wes Newton
    8 42.1% (8/19) Ronnie Baxter
    9 41.9% (49/117) Andy Hamilton
    10 41.0% (34/83) Raymond van Barneveld
    11 40.8% (53/130) Adrian Lewis
    12 40.5% (17/42) Wayne Jones
    13 39.2% (38/97) Simon Whitlock
    14 39.1% (18/46) Justin Pipe
    15 37.8% (17/45) Steve Beaton
    16 36.8% (21/57) John Henderson
    16 36.8% (7/19) Peter Wright
    18 35.3% (12/34) Kevin Painter
    19 34.5% (10/29) Colin Osborne
    20 34.0% (35/103) Mark Webster
    21 31.9% (15/47) Vincent van der Voort
    22 30.0% (3/10) Steve Brown
    23 28.6% (6/21) Gary Anderson
    24 27.3% (3/11) Terry Jenkins
    25 26.9% (7/26) Colin Lloyd
    26 26.1% (6/23) Scott Rand
    27 25.0% (11/44) Denis Ovens
    28 23.5% (8/34) John Part
    29 22.6% (7/31) Alan Tabern
    30 20.0% (2/10) Andy Smith
    31 16.7% (3/18) Dave Chisnall
    32 0.0% (0/12) Jamie Caven

    Turnier: 38.9% (586/1505)

    Last 32: 35.8%
    Achtelfinale: 41.2%
    Viertelfinale: 42.4%
    Halbfinale: 43.1%

    Nach dem Halbfinale

    1 106.00 Phil Taylor
    2 99.56 Mark Hylton
    3 98.04 Gary Anderson
    4 96.05 Wes Newton
    5 95.86 Colin Osborne
    6 95.73 Adrian Lewis
    7 95.71 Simon Whitlock
    8 95.43 Raymond van Barneveld
    9 95.05 Mark Walsh
    10 94.98 Justin Pipe
    11 94.81 Andy Hamilton
    12 94.74 James Wade
    13 94.49 Steve Beaton
    14 94.49 Wayne Jones
    15 94.11 Paul Nicholson
    16 93.73 Dave Chisnall
    17 92.91 Kevin Painter
    18 92.28 Peter Wright
    19 91.69 Mark Webster
    20 91.02 Steve Brown
    21 90.75 John Part
    22 89.58 Vincent van der Voort
    23 88.99 Scott Rand
    24 88.18 John Henderson
    25 87.78 Denis Ovens
    26 87.38 Alan Tabern
    27 86.10 Terry Jenkins
    28 84.92 Colin Lloyd
    29 84.88 Ronnie Baxter
    30 84.22 Mervyn King
    31 84.13 Andy Smith
    32 82.00 Jamie Caven

    Turnier 2011: 93.86 (2010: 92.88)

    Last 32: 91.70 (2010: 90.56)
    Achtelfinale: 94.68 (2010: 92.29)
    Viertelfinale: 96.24 (2010: 95.32)
    Halbfinale: 97.72 (2010: 98.35)

    OOM 22.07.2011

    1 Phil Taylor +£799,200
    2 Adrian Lewis +£398,000
    3 James Wade +£312,742 (4)

    4 Gary Anderson £299,300 (3)
    5 Simon Whitlock £259,750
    6 Raymond van Barneveld £219,100
    7 Wes Newton £213,239
    8 Mark Webster £189,942

    9 Terry Jenkins £170,970
    10 Paul Nicholson £167,921
    11 Andy Hamilton +£157,236 (15)
    12 Mervyn King £150,600 (11)
    13 Mark Walsh £150,142 (12)
    14 Colin Lloyd £147,285 (13)
    15 Wayne Jones £146,000 (14)
    16 Vincent van der Voort £136,500 (17)

    17 Ronnie Baxter £134,442 (16)
    18 Jamie Caven £125,885
    19 Colin Osborne £122,642
    20 Andy Smith £117,800
    21 Steve Beaton £114,585 (22)
    22 Kevin Painter £113,242 (21)
    23 Denis Ovens £111,385
    24 Alan Tabern £97,239
    25 Co Stompe £93,521
    26 Robert Thornton £92,170
    27 Dennis Priestley £87,722
    28 Mark Dudbridge £80,800
    29 Jelle Klaasen £77,742
    30 Steve Brown £75,100
    31 John Part £71,142
    32 Barrie Bates £65,642

    33 Peter Wright £61,221
    34 Michael van Gerwen £60,700
    35 Brendan Dolan Northern £56,800
    36 Tony Eccles £48,842
    37 Kevin McDine £45,842
    38 Justin Pipe £45,200 (40)
    39 Mark Hylton £43,800 (38)
    40 Steve Farmer £43,100 (39)
    41 Kirk Shepherd £38,370
    42 Steve Hine £36,642
    43 Richie Burnett £34,200
    44 Roland Scholten £33,692
    45 Mensur Suljovic £32,200
    46 Steve Maish £30,935
    47 Dennis Smith £29,185
    48 Nigel Heydon £27,800
    49 Dave Chisnall £25,000
    50 Alex Roy £24,900

    += still in the tournament